| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Our internal IPs don't have a reverse PTR record, and skipping the
resolution speeds up mail delivery.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_peername_lookup
|
| |
|
|
| |
See RFC 8314 sec. 3.3 "Cleartext Considered Obsolete".
|
| |
|
|
| |
Cf. http://www.openspf.org/Best_Practices/Outbound .
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
And use ‘noreply.fripost.org’ as HELO name rather than $myhostname
(i.e., ‘smtp.fripost.org’), so the same SPF policy can be used for ehlo
and envelope sender identities.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Unlike what we wrote in 2014 (cf. 4fb4be4d279dd94cab33fc778cfa318b93d6926f)
the postscreen(8) server can run chrooted, meaning we can also chroot
the smtpd(8), tlsproxy(8), dnsblog(8) and cleanup(8) daemons.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We're relaying messages to our LMTP daemons (Dovecot, Amavisd) and some
downstream SMTP servers, not all of which are under our control.
Forwarding messages with UTF-8 envelope addresses or RFC 5322 headers
yields undeliverable messages, and the bounces make us a potential
backscatter source. So it's better to disable SMTPUTF8 at this point.
Cf. also http://www.postfix.org/SMTPUTF8_README.html and
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/320091/configure-postfix-and-dovecot-lmtp-to-receive-mail-via-smtputf8 .
See also upstream's comment at https://marc.info/?l=postfix-users&m=149183235529042&w=2 :
“Perhaps SMTPUTF8 autodetection could be more granular: UTF8 in the
envelope is definitely problematic for a receiver that does not
support SMTPUTF8, while UTF8 in a message header is less so.”
|
| |
|
|
| |
Cf. lmdb_table(5).
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The following policy is now implemented:
* users can use their SASL login name as sender address;
* alias and/or list owners can use the address as envelope sender;
* domain postmasters can use arbitrary sender addresses under their
domains;
* domain owners can use arbitrary sender addresses under their domains,
unless it is also an existing account name;
* for known domains without owner or postmasters, other sender addresses
are not allowed; and
* arbitrary sender addresses under unknown domains are allowed.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Following Viktor Dukhovni's 2015-08-06 recommendation
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/251935
(We're using stronger ciphers and protocols in our own infrastructure.)
|
| |
|
|
| |
That is, on the MSA and in our local infrastructure.
|
| |
|
|
| |
cert itself.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
For some reason giraff doesn't like IPSec. App-level TLS sessions are
less efficient, but thanks to ansible it still scales well.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In fact we want to only rewrite the envelope sender:
:/etc/postfix/main.cf
# Overwrite local FQDN envelope sender addresses
sender_canonical_classes = envelope_sender
propagate_unmatched_extensions =
sender_canonical_maps = cdb:$config_directory/sender_canonical
:/etc/postfix/sender_canonical
@elefant.fripost.org admin@fripost.org
However, when canonical(5) processes a mail sent vias sendmail(1), it
rewrites the envelope sender which seems to *later* be use as From:
header.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
E.g., ldap.fripost.org, ntp.fripost.org, etc. (Ideally the DNS zone
would be provisioned by ansible, too.) It's a bit unclear how to index
the subdomains (mx{1,2,3}, etc), though.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
And use main.cf's 'master_service_disable' setting to deactivate each
service that's useless for a given instance. (Hence solve conflict when
trying to listen twice on the same port, for instance.)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's unfortunate that samhain cannot use the sendmail binary, and wants
to use a inet socket instead. We use a custom port to avoid
conflicts with the usual SMTP port the MX:es need to listen on.
See also: /usr/share/doc/samhain/TODO.Debian
|
|
|
We use a dedicated instance for each role: MDA, MTA out, MX, etc.
|
