From 44a42938d2a3199893416657a6fba376368cc93a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gustav Eek <gustav.eek@etraveli.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 01:47:07 +0200
Subject: [prsnts/common-goods] Presentation Fripost as a common -- Initail
 commit

Initial commit of the presentation of Fripost and on Internet as a
common good resource for FSCONS 2017. Draft of proposal,
*proposal.mdwn*, and early draft of script, *script.mdwn,
created.

Also provided are intital *README* and bibliography,
*bibliography.mdwn*.
---
 presentations/common-goods/README            |  12 ++
 presentations/common-goods/bibliography.mdwn |   4 +
 presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn     |  79 +++++++++++++
 presentations/common-goods/script.mdwn       | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 265 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 presentations/common-goods/README
 create mode 100644 presentations/common-goods/bibliography.mdwn
 create mode 100644 presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn
 create mode 100644 presentations/common-goods/script.mdwn

diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/README b/presentations/common-goods/README
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3c90f74
--- /dev/null
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/README
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+Presentation "Demokratisk kommuicationsinfrastruktur som motståndsform" inför FSCONS 2017
+
+Presentationen bygger på tankar om Fripost i en kontext av Gemensam
+nytta. Inspirationen kommer från Mattei's *Gemensam Nytta*.
+
+**Dokument**
+
+ * *application.mdwn* -- Ansökan till FSCONS 2017
+ * *script.mdwn* -- Manuskriptet
+ * *presentation.mdwn* -- Presentationsorginal
+ * *bibliography.mdwn* -- Vad det låter som
+ * *Makefile* -- Kör *make* för att bygga 
diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/bibliography.mdwn b/presentations/common-goods/bibliography.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2effa0f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/bibliography.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+
+ * Ugo Mattei 2011, *Gemensam Nytta*, (original *Beni Comuni*), Balders förlag, Riga 2016.
+
+ * Catharina Thörn 2017, (*Kolla upp titel*), Editorial note (*Ledare?*) in *Dagens ETC*, July 3, 2017.
diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn b/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..601de6a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+---
+title: Demokratisk kommuicationsinfrastruktur som motståndsform
+subtitle: Technology infrastructure as a common googd
+author: Gustav Eek <gustav@fripost.org>
+date: tor 13 jul 2017 20:18:26 CEST
+...
+
+Proposal to FSCONS 2017
+
+# Abstract
+
+In this lecture I will present the democratic principles of Fripost
+and demonstrate how also complicated resources, such as infrastructure
+for electronic communication can (and must) (*underställas folkligt
+demokratiska pricesser?*) (I argue that central communication
+infrastructure should be viewed as a resource).
+
+I will start in a (well known) critique of Garret Hardin's (*Vem
+talade om detta FSCONS 2015?*) classical tragedy of the commons
+(*referens*) (one that has been presented many times before).
+
+# Description
+
+The importance of Internet as communication medium can not be
+questioned. For those who take user freedom seriously it is saddening
+to see how the Internet has changed from being a common and highly
+distributed network to the increasingly privatised web we encounter
+today.
+
+In this lecture I will present the democratic principles of Fripost,
+the free email association which was founded as a reaction to that
+development. I will demonstrate how also complicated resources, such
+as infrastructure for electronic communication can (and must)
+(*underställas folkligt demokratiska pricesser?*).
+
+Fripost and its foundataion and principals has been presented several
+times since its constitution in 2010, also at FSCONS. This
+presentation, however, takes a different and broader stand.
+
+I will start in a (common) critique of Garret Hardin's (*Vem talade om
+detta FSCONS 2015?*) classical tragedy of the commons (*referens*)
+(one that has been presented many times before). The fault lies in the
+dikotonomy *public-private* and in the idea that every resource needs
+an owning (*huvudmann?*). What is not managed can not yield profit. In
+the case of the (*inhängdad?*) of the commons, management in it self
+causes the scarcity, it is not the scarcity that requires management.
+
+It is not obvious, however, how digital technology and technology
+based on Internet can be recognised as a resource and common
+good. Though "friendly" in its usage, it is intrinsically intricate
+and complicated in its internals, and the distance is far between the
+providing and consuming ends.
+
+Here Fripost becomes an example of central communication
+infrastructure that implements democratic "ownership", maintenance,
+and development. And democracy is equal influence: it does not stop at
+gathering of opinion.
+
+Equal influence is ambitious, and how it is interpreted in Fripost
+will be discussed in its details, but in short the key is that
+Fripost's commitment (*åtagande?*) is equally much social as it is
+technical: all decisions originates from the members, short term as
+well as strategical; activities are balanced between the association's
+three legs: (a) technology, (b) adult education, and (c) propaganda;
+and sustainability is the leading word.
+
+I humbly recognise that what we do is small in scale and ambition. But
+I still want to put it in the context of important local struggles
+that with global implication. In the world, farmers fight for land,
+urban folks for water, and students for independent universities. We
+fight for the right and free access to Internet and the means for
+communication. Internet is designed to be distributed and for equal
+unlimited access for everyone. That sounds quite much like a common
+good, and commons require equal influence.
+
+The moral of the presentation is of course that we should fight back
+against the privatisation process, particularly that of the
+web. Fripost illustrates that it is possible and also suggest how it
+can be done.
diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/script.mdwn b/presentations/common-goods/script.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2e67221
--- /dev/null
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/script.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+---
+title: Demokratisk kommuicationsinfrastruktur som motståndsform
+subtitle: Technology infrastructure as a common googd
+author: Gustav Eek <gustav@fripost.org>
+date: tor 13 jul 2017 20:18:26 CEST
+...
+
+Script.
+
+# Scattered notes
+
+**Introduction and background -- importance of the Internet**
+
+The importance of Internet as communication medium can not be
+questioned. For those who take user freedom seriously it is saddening
+to see how the Internet has changed from being a common and highly
+distributed network to the increasingly privatised web we encounter
+today. The capital constantly require right to increased profit, and
+it constantly seeks new grounds
+
+\section*{Software as a Service} A concept introduced in the spirit of
+centralisation is \textit{Software as a Service} (SaaS). SaaS means
+that users perform their computer work on or through a network server
+on the Internet or a local network. Examples of SaaS are Amazon Cloud
+and Google Docs. One of the main problems with SaaS is that the users
+has no control over their data.
+
+\section*{Privacy and Surveillance}
+With large clientele comes a lot of power. Large transnational
+operators, such as Google, are profiting from efficient use of privacy
+invading schemes. Together with e.g.\ Google's email service one also
+gets things that was probably \emph{not} asked for: advertisement,
+semantic analysis of email contents, and spying. One part of Google's
+marketing strategy is to sell the collected information to third
+party.
+
+
+We formed the association in 2010, seven years ago. Our chairman at
+the time, Stefan Kangas poited out to me, what I did not quite
+understand at the time, but what is becomming increasingly clear to
+me. Fripost is part of a general resistance struggle (motståndskamp)
+of global scale (mot griptången). This was in the early beginning of
+the Arabic spring in Libya. 
+
+(*Citer Mattei s. 64)
+
+The common good (gemensamt nyttiga) is something that is natural to
+take as given, and it deserves to be.
+
+**More introduction ideas**
+
+The importance of Internet as communication medium can not be
+questioned. For those who take user freedom seriously it is saddening
+to see how the Internet has changed from being a common and highly
+distributed network to the increasingly privatised web we encounter
+today.
+
+In this lecture I will present the democratic principles of Fripost
+and demonstrate how also complicated resources, such as infrastructure
+for electronic communication can (and must) (*underställas folkligt
+demokratiska pricesser?*) (I argue that central communication
+infrastructure should be viewed as a resource).
+
+I will start in a (well known) critique of Garret Hardin's (*Vem
+talade om detta FSCONS 2015?*) classical tragedy of the commons
+(*referens*) (one that has been presented many times before).
+
+Of course we recognise that this process of privatisation and
+enclosure (*att hägna in?*) is not isolated to Internet
+infrastructure. The capital constantly require right to increased
+profit, and it constantly seeks new grounds. However, the Internet and
+digital technology an area where this process is very (*närvarande?*).
+One of the later (*landvinningar*) is the right consumer data through
+various privacy intrusive software as a service technologies (read
+Google Drive). And of course state and inter state institutions
+rather (*eldar på*) than (*stämmer*) the development.
+
+**Enclosure vs innovation**
+
+(*Continuation on "process of privatisation"*). Digital technology is
+intricically intricacy and complicatied in its internals, though still
+"friendly" in its usage. Therfore it can be dificult to distinguish
+privitasation (*inhängnad*) from innovation.
+
+Side note. In my opinion, private innovation and development is
+natural and of not at all problematic. Of course, however as a note to
+the note, enclosing technology and restricting its usage (e.g. throung
+proprietary software development) is highly non moral and should not
+be accepted.
+
+
+Fripost was founded in order to take back a small, but important, part
+of our Internet life, namely the email communication
+infrastructure. We gather around several servers that receive and
+stores the members' email. The reliability of the service is of cause
+of great importance. Therefore the network is arranged with
+reliability in mind, and we hire a hosting service for the main
+server.
+
+
+We formed Fripost in 2010 in reaction to ... (*Fyll på med Google och
+Facebook, etc*) ...
+
+Proper democracy. 
+
+Democracy is about influence and power: the power to make decisions
+and have them implemented. 
+
+**Citizen Dialogues**
+
+Surveys in Sweden say that people show more interest in
+society and politics than some years ago. Still trust and
+participation in municipiatal parlamentary proceses and traditional
+parties decay.
+
+As a response, the municipalities and regions in Sweden (SKL (*Vad?*))
+suggest so called citizen dialogues (*medborgardialoger*), usually in
+connection with major infrastructure and city development projects, as
+a way gather peoples opinion. This (*tilltag*) is Inspired by Sherry
+Airnstein (*Kolla upp detta*) and planning research from the
+1960'es. Her original ideas, however, had an equality idea
+(*rättvisetanke?*. That idea of equality is totally lost in the way
+these "dialoges" are committed: "Symbolic participation", Airnstein
+would call it. Real participation require delegated power. (Thörn 2017)
+
+The common good (gemensamt nyttiga) is something that is natural to
+take as given, and it deserves to be.
+
+**Compararison with other commons: Common intellect**
+
+I want to put the Internet (and all kinds of tele communication)
+besides other common resources, such as (a) our soil, (b) sources of
+water, (c) libraries and published knowledge, (d) and more.
+
+Idea (viewpoint) ... owned and managed by one single (*huvudman?*)
+... historically speciffic. 
+
+Common management (not quite managed) of water in rural India is
+described by Vandana Shiva (*provide reference*). Privatisation and
+"management" *caused* scarcity.
+
+The fault lies in the dikotonomy *public-private* and in the idea that
+every resource needs an owning (*huvudmann?*). What is not managed can
+not yield profit. In the case of the (*inhängdad?*) of the commons,
+management in it self causes the scarcity, it is not the scarcity that
+requires management.
+
+Logic: if it is not scars it can not be managed, and what is not
+managed can not yield profit.
+
+Compare owning with being (*äganda med varande*) (Engels). Another
+mindset
+
+Ugo Mattei describes this mindset as a *common intellect*.
+
+(*Beskriv också utarmningarna av jordarna som beskrivs i "Den sista
+skörden" (eller var det "Slutsködat"?). Exemplifiera också med
+Fukuoka's senaste*)
+
+**Final**
+
+I humbly recognise that what we do is small in scale and ambition. But
+I still want to put it in the context of important local struggles
+that with global implication. In the world, farmers fight for land,
+urban folks for water, and students for independent universities. We
+fight for the right and free access to Internet and the means for
+communication. Internet is designed to be distributed and for equal
+unlimited access for everyone. That sounds quite much like a common
+good, and commons require equal influence.
+
-- 
cgit v1.2.3


From 449a32efbbbc79c25bfb57f0dc33e398f22d59a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gustav Eek <gustav.eek@etraveli.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 01:52:03 +0200
Subject: [prsnts/common-goods] Presentation common goods

Some thoughts added to the script on moral and *economism*, *comunism*
and *ecologism*.
---
 presentations/common-goods/script.mdwn | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/script.mdwn b/presentations/common-goods/script.mdwn
index 2e67221..b7c3d3e 100644
--- a/presentations/common-goods/script.mdwn
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/script.mdwn
@@ -157,6 +157,22 @@ Ugo Mattei describes this mindset as a *common intellect*.
 skörden" (eller var det "Slutsködat"?). Exemplifiera också med
 Fukuoka's senaste*)
 
+Vandana Shiva, Fukuoka, med flera är alla ekologister. Ugo Mattei
+lovordar ekologismen i *ekologism* vs. *ekonomism*. Jag antar att
+tre-tuppeln, trikotonomin, ska vara *ekonomism* (privat, begränsad,
+hantering), *kommunim* (gemensam hantering) *ekologism* (ingen
+hantering eller hantering basserad på gemensamt intellekt).
+
+Föreslår att var och ens moral torde vara giltig liknelse för
+gemensamt intellekt. Ekonomismen förutsätter ekonomisk rationalitet
+och därmed avsaknad av moral. Kommunismen tillskriver solidaritet och
+det gemensamma intresset som grund för moral. De två senare hamnar i
+komplicerade förklaringsmodeller för individuellt moraliskt handlande
+(*vilke exempel kan vi hitta*) och vill t.ex. förklara hipsters
+blygsamhet i konsumtion som rationellt med livsstilsargumentet. Att
+helt enkelt acceptera moral som giltig grund för konsumtionsbeslut
+torde vara den enklaste modellen. Men bara ekologismen till en sådan.
+
 **Final**
 
 I humbly recognise that what we do is small in scale and ambition. But
-- 
cgit v1.2.3


From 8a2dc7946bc13f02fc7b9ba5ff02c08d99b8ceb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gustav Eek <gustav.eek@etraveli.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 11:16:50 +0200
Subject: [presentations/common-goods] Proposal as sent in to FSCONS

The proposal is updated to its format it is sent in
---
 presentations/common-goods/bibliography.mdwn |  9 ++++
 presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn     | 72 +++++++++++++++-------------
 presentations/common-goods/script.mdwn       | 10 ++--
 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/bibliography.mdwn b/presentations/common-goods/bibliography.mdwn
index 2effa0f..ddcdcca 100644
--- a/presentations/common-goods/bibliography.mdwn
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/bibliography.mdwn
@@ -1,4 +1,13 @@
+Books
 
  * Ugo Mattei 2011, *Gemensam Nytta*, (original *Beni Comuni*), Balders förlag, Riga 2016.
 
+Articles
+
  * Catharina Thörn 2017, (*Kolla upp titel*), Editorial note (*Ledare?*) in *Dagens ETC*, July 3, 2017.
+
+ Talks
+
+ * Dougald Hine 2014, *What do you mean, "Full Commonism"?*, FSCONS 2014, 2014-11-01, https://frab.fscons.org/en/fscons14/public/events/181
+
+ * Dougald Hine and Lars Noväng 2014, *The Friendly Commoner*, FSCONS 2014, 2014-11-01, https://frab.fscons.org/en/fscons14/public/events/209
diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn b/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn
index 601de6a..9d2d859 100644
--- a/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
-title: Demokratisk kommuicationsinfrastruktur som motståndsform
-subtitle: Technology infrastructure as a common googd
+title: Communication infrastructure – a form of resistance
+subtitle: Fripost: digital technology as a common good for user freedom and control
 author: Gustav Eek <gustav@fripost.org>
 date: tor 13 jul 2017 20:18:26 CEST
 ...
@@ -9,15 +9,13 @@ Proposal to FSCONS 2017
 
 # Abstract
 
-In this lecture I will present the democratic principles of Fripost
-and demonstrate how also complicated resources, such as infrastructure
-for electronic communication can (and must) (*underställas folkligt
-demokratiska pricesser?*) (I argue that central communication
-infrastructure should be viewed as a resource).
-
-I will start in a (well known) critique of Garret Hardin's (*Vem
-talade om detta FSCONS 2015?*) classical tragedy of the commons
-(*referens*) (one that has been presented many times before).
+In this lecture the democratic principles of Fripost, the free email
+association (founded in 2010) will be presented. Infrastructure for
+electronic communication will be resembled with a common good (a
+resource). That using a critique of the *public--private* dichotomy,
+and the tragedy of the commons. I will then demonstrate how also
+complicated resources can (and must) be made subject to democratic
+control.
 
 # Description
 
@@ -29,40 +27,46 @@ today.
 
 In this lecture I will present the democratic principles of Fripost,
 the free email association which was founded as a reaction to that
-development. I will demonstrate how also complicated resources, such
-as infrastructure for electronic communication can (and must)
-(*underställas folkligt demokratiska pricesser?*).
+development. I will resemble infrastructure for electronic
+communication with a common good (a resource), and I will demonstrate
+how also complicated resources can (and must) be made subject to
+democratic control.
 
-Fripost and its foundataion and principals has been presented several
-times since its constitution in 2010, also at FSCONS. This
-presentation, however, takes a different and broader stand.
+Fripost and its foundation and democratic principals has been
+presented several times since its constitution in 2010, also at
+FSCONS. This is why the lecture also will take a different and broader
+stand, inspired by some recent readings. The Fripost initative will
+also be put in context of local struggles with global implication.
 
-I will start in a (common) critique of Garret Hardin's (*Vem talade om
-detta FSCONS 2015?*) classical tragedy of the commons (*referens*)
-(one that has been presented many times before). The fault lies in the
-dikotonomy *public-private* and in the idea that every resource needs
-an owning (*huvudmann?*). What is not managed can not yield profit. In
-the case of the (*inhängdad?*) of the commons, management in it self
-causes the scarcity, it is not the scarcity that requires management.
+In short, the idea that every resource needs an single responsible and
+managing owner is unsatisfactory as well as the dichotomy
+*public--private*. What is not managed can not yield profit. But some
+things are to important even to be managed. Naturally this touches on
+a critique (which has been presented many times before) of Hardin's
+classical tragedy of the commons. Regarding the enclosure of the
+commons, management in it self causes the scarcity, The commons are
+not scarce resources that requires management.
 
 It is not obvious, however, how digital technology and technology
 based on Internet can be recognised as a resource and common
-good. Though "friendly" in its usage, it is intrinsically intricate
-and complicated in its internals, and the distance is far between the
-providing and consuming ends.
+good. Though "friendly" in its usage, digital technology is
+intrinsically intricate and complicated in its internals, and the
+distance is far between the providing and consuming ends. What is the
+interpretation of democratic influence and control in the case of
+digital technology? And what is user freedom for Internet services?
 
 Here Fripost becomes an example of central communication
 infrastructure that implements democratic "ownership", maintenance,
-and development. And democracy is equal influence: it does not stop at
-gathering of opinion.
+and development. And democracy is *equal influence*: it does not stop
+at the gathering of opinion.
 
 Equal influence is ambitious, and how it is interpreted in Fripost
 will be discussed in its details, but in short the key is that
-Fripost's commitment (*åtagande?*) is equally much social as it is
-technical: all decisions originates from the members, short term as
-well as strategical; activities are balanced between the association's
-three legs: (a) technology, (b) adult education, and (c) propaganda;
-and sustainability is the leading word.
+Fripost's commitment is equally much social as it is technical: all
+decisions originates from the members, short term as well as
+strategical; activities are balanced between the association's three
+legs: (a) technology, (b) adult education, and (c) propaganda; and
+sustainability is the leading word.
 
 I humbly recognise that what we do is small in scale and ambition. But
 I still want to put it in the context of important local struggles
diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/script.mdwn b/presentations/common-goods/script.mdwn
index b7c3d3e..9fe1011 100644
--- a/presentations/common-goods/script.mdwn
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/script.mdwn
@@ -61,9 +61,13 @@ for electronic communication can (and must) (*underställas folkligt
 demokratiska pricesser?*) (I argue that central communication
 infrastructure should be viewed as a resource).
 
-I will start in a (well known) critique of Garret Hardin's (*Vem
-talade om detta FSCONS 2015?*) classical tragedy of the commons
-(*referens*) (one that has been presented many times before).
+I will start in a (well known) critique of Garret Hardin's classical
+tragedy of the commons (*referens*) (one that has been presented many
+times before). One example is Duoglad Hine, *What do you mean, "Full
+Commonism"?* and *The Friendly Commoner*, FSCONS 2014.
+
+(*Read more on Duoglad Hine's talks*)
+
 
 Of course we recognise that this process of privatisation and
 enclosure (*att hägna in?*) is not isolated to Internet
-- 
cgit v1.2.3


From 5cf6256f593dc26513c29e606da78899b5110802 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gustav Eek <gustav.eek@etraveli.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 19:46:21 +0200
Subject: [prsnts/common-goods] Proposal translated to Swedish
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

The Proposal translated to Swedish and sent in to Bokmasssan:

----- Forwarded message from Olav Fumarola Unsgaard <olav.unsgaard@gmail.com> -----

Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 09:16:46 +0000
From: Olav Fumarola Unsgaard <olav.unsgaard@gmail.com>
To: Gustav Eek <gustav.eek@fripost.org>
Cc: Olav Fumarola Unsgaard <olav@etc.se>
Subject: Re: Föreningen Fripost vill anordna seminarium på Bokmassan

Tack för er anmälan.
/Olav
---
 presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn b/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn
index 9d2d859..feba820 100644
--- a/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
-title: Communication infrastructure – a form of resistance
-subtitle: Fripost: digital technology as a common good for user freedom and control
+title: Communication infrastructure – a form of resistance? (*SV* Kommunikationsinfrastruktur – en motståndsform? *SV*)
+subtitle: Fripost: digital technology as a common good for user freedom and control (*sv* Fripost: digital teknik som gemensam nyttighet för användarfrihet och -kontroll *sv)
 author: Gustav Eek <gustav@fripost.org>
 date: tor 13 jul 2017 20:18:26 CEST
 ...
@@ -17,6 +17,21 @@ and the tragedy of the commons. I will then demonstrate how also
 complicated resources can (and must) be made subject to democratic
 control.
 
+(*SV*
+
+I seminariet kommer vi presentera de demokratiska principerna som
+ligger till grund för föreningen Fripost, den demokratiska
+e-postföreningen (som grundades 2010). Vi kommer dra relevanta
+paralleller mellan elektronisk kommunikationsinfrastruktur och
+gemensamma nyttigheter (de är t.ex. båda resurser). Det bland annat
+genom att kritisera dikotomin *offentlig--privat* och vanliga idéer
+kring Allmänningarnas tragedi. Vi kommer också i detalj beskriva hur
+en komplex och komplicerad resurs kan (och måste) underställas
+demokratisk kontroll.
+
+*SV*)
+
+
 # Description
 
 The importance of Internet as communication medium can not be
@@ -35,7 +50,7 @@ democratic control.
 Fripost and its foundation and democratic principals has been
 presented several times since its constitution in 2010, also at
 FSCONS. This is why the lecture also will take a different and broader
-stand, inspired by some recent readings. The Fripost initative will
+stand, inspired by some recent readings. The Fripost initiative will
 also be put in context of local struggles with global implication.
 
 In short, the idea that every resource needs an single responsible and
@@ -68,6 +83,18 @@ strategical; activities are balanced between the association's three
 legs: (a) technology, (b) adult education, and (c) propaganda; and
 sustainability is the leading word.
 
+(*sv*
+
+Likainflytande är ett ambitiöst anspråk, och hur det tolkas i Fripost
+kommer diskuteras i dess detaljer. I korthet ligger det centrala i att
+Friposts åtagande lika mycket är socialt som tekniskt: alla beslut har
+sitt ursprung i medlemmarna, kortsiktiga så väl som
+strategiska. Därför baseras föreningens verksamhet på tre grundpelare:
+(a) teknik, (b) folkbildning och (c) informationsspridning; och
+hållbarhet är ledordet.
+
+*sv*)
+
 I humbly recognise that what we do is small in scale and ambition. But
 I still want to put it in the context of important local struggles
 that with global implication. In the world, farmers fight for land,
-- 
cgit v1.2.3


From cb7ed171dde8cd527970429e77ff61c77435f3e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gustav Eek <gustav.eek@etraveli.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 19:05:17 +0200
Subject: [prsnts/common-goods] Makefile added that creates nice notes

The note/script printouts are made very nice with neat
Latex formatting and the pdfinsert package.
---
 presentations/common-goods/Makefile | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 presentations/common-goods/Makefile

diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/Makefile b/presentations/common-goods/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a9a2ed9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+notes = \
+  eek-2017-09-common-goods-notes-sv.pdf
+
+all: $(notes)
+
+%-notes-sv.pdf: script-sv.mdwn
+	pandoc -s -S -f markdown -t latex \
+          -V "classoption=a4paper,12pt" \
+          -V "geometry=paperwidth=.5\paperwidth,hmargin=8mm,top=10mm,bottom=15mm,includefoot" \
+          -o $(basename $<)_.pdf $<
+	echo '$(tex-includepdf-nup)' | pdflatex -jobname $(basename $@)
+	rm $(basename $<)_.pdf
+
+define tex-includepdf-nup
+\documentclass[a4paper, 11pt]{article}\
+\usepackage[a4paper, margin = 0pt]{geometry}\
+\usepackage{pdfpages}\
+\pagestyle{empty}\
+\begin{document}\
+\includepdf[pages = -, nup = 2x1]{$(basename $<)_.pdf}\
+\end{document}
+endef
+
+clean:
+	rm -f $(notes)
+	rm -f *.aux *.log
+	rm -f *.tex
+	rm -f *.pdf
+	rm -f *~
+
+
+
+SHELL = /bin/bash
+
-- 
cgit v1.2.3


From a46b1d60b7675f6fc28a5e3ab636ff8ee6a02127 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gustav Eek <gustav.eek@etraveli.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 19:06:15 +0200
Subject: [prsnts/common-goods] Language devision provided throughout the
 proposal

---
 presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn b/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn
index feba820..b58ba6d 100644
--- a/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn
@@ -1,13 +1,16 @@
 ---
-title: Communication infrastructure – a form of resistance? (*SV* Kommunikationsinfrastruktur – en motståndsform? *SV*)
-subtitle: Fripost: digital technology as a common good for user freedom and control (*sv* Fripost: digital teknik som gemensam nyttighet för användarfrihet och -kontroll *sv)
+title: (*en* Communication infrastructure – a form of resistance? *en*)(*sv* Kommunikationsinfrastruktur – en motståndsform? *sv*)
+subtitle: (*en* Fripost: digital technology as a common good for user freedom and control *en*)(*sv* Fripost: digital teknik som gemensam nyttighet för användarfrihet och -kontroll *sv*)
 author: Gustav Eek <gustav@fripost.org>
 date: tor 13 jul 2017 20:18:26 CEST
 ...
 
-Proposal to FSCONS 2017
 
-# Abstract
+(*en* Proposal to FSCONS 2017 *en*)(*sv* Förslag Bokmassan 2017 *sv*)
+
+# (*en* Abstract *en*)(*sv* Sammanfattning *sv*)
+
+(*en*
 
 In this lecture the democratic principles of Fripost, the free email
 association (founded in 2010) will be presented. Infrastructure for
@@ -17,7 +20,8 @@ and the tragedy of the commons. I will then demonstrate how also
 complicated resources can (and must) be made subject to democratic
 control.
 
-(*SV*
+*en*)
+(*sv*
 
 I seminariet kommer vi presentera de demokratiska principerna som
 ligger till grund för föreningen Fripost, den demokratiska
@@ -29,10 +33,12 @@ kring Allmänningarnas tragedi. Vi kommer också i detalj beskriva hur
 en komplex och komplicerad resurs kan (och måste) underställas
 demokratisk kontroll.
 
-*SV*)
+*sv*)
+
 
+# (*en* Description *en*)(*sv* Beskrivnign *sv*)
 
-# Description
+(*en*
 
 The importance of Internet as communication medium can not be
 questioned. For those who take user freedom seriously it is saddening
@@ -83,6 +89,7 @@ strategical; activities are balanced between the association's three
 legs: (a) technology, (b) adult education, and (c) propaganda; and
 sustainability is the leading word.
 
+*en*)
 (*sv*
 
 Likainflytande är ett ambitiöst anspråk, och hur det tolkas i Fripost
@@ -94,6 +101,7 @@ strategiska. Därför baseras föreningens verksamhet på tre grundpelare:
 hållbarhet är ledordet.
 
 *sv*)
+(*en*
 
 I humbly recognise that what we do is small in scale and ambition. But
 I still want to put it in the context of important local struggles
@@ -108,3 +116,5 @@ The moral of the presentation is of course that we should fight back
 against the privatisation process, particularly that of the
 web. Fripost illustrates that it is possible and also suggest how it
 can be done.
+
+*en*)
-- 
cgit v1.2.3


From 8783ede41e026b82456ee2692e129bf381b26e1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gustav Eek <gustav.eek@etraveli.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 19:15:02 +0200
Subject: [prsnts/common-goods] Initial commit on sweedish script

---
 presentations/common-goods/bibliography.mdwn |  6 +-
 presentations/common-goods/script-sv.mdwn    | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 presentations/common-goods/script-sv.mdwn

diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/bibliography.mdwn b/presentations/common-goods/bibliography.mdwn
index ddcdcca..962e2df 100644
--- a/presentations/common-goods/bibliography.mdwn
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/bibliography.mdwn
@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
 Books
 
- * Ugo Mattei 2011, *Gemensam Nytta*, (original *Beni Comuni*), Balders förlag, Riga 2016.
+ * Ugo Mattei (2011), *Gemensam Nytta*, Balders förlag, Riga 2016. (orig. *Beni Comuni*, 2011)
+
+ * Vandana Shiva (2003), *Krig om vattnet: plundring och profit*,
+   Ordfront, 2003. (orig. *Water wars: privatization, pollution and
+   profit*, 2002, övers. Lillemor Ganuza Jonsson)
 
 Articles
 
diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/script-sv.mdwn b/presentations/common-goods/script-sv.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c9cbf62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/script-sv.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+---
+title: 'Kommunikationsinfrastruktur -- en motståndsform?'
+subtitle: 'Fripost: digital teknik som gemensam nyttighet för användarfrihet och -kontroll'
+author: 'Gustav Eek <gustav@fripost.org>'
+date: 30 sep 2017
+...
+
+
+# Inledning
+
+*Vem är jag?*
+
+*Vad är Fripost?*
+
+
+# Bakgrund
+
+*Vad gör jag här -- här på Bokmassan?*
+
+*Problembilden, hotbilden*
+
+*Demokrati, varför är det viktigt? Förtroendet för politiken, och
+kampen mot elitismen.*
+
+*Med bakgrund i Ugo Mattei*
+
+*Det gemensamma, gemensam nytta och allmänning --
+definition. T.ex, allmänningen -- bruk i.s.f. ägande.*
+
+*Det blir mer när man hjälps åt. ekologi i.s.f. ekonomi, hållbarhet
+i.s.f. begränsning*
+
+
+# Budskap -- Fripost är demokratisk
+
+*Det gemensamma kräver demokratisk organisering: Fuck
+etablisemanget och staten*
+
+*Fripost är demokratisk*
+
+*Kommunikaitonsinfrastrukturen är en allmänning precis som andra*
+
+# Belägg
+
+*Hur vi organiserar -- de tre benen*
+
+ * *Tekniken -- Vad vi faktiskt gör möjligt och att det är något*
+
+ * *Folkbildningen -- verkstäder o.s.v.*
+
+ * *Informationsspridning -- det är det som jag gör här*
+
+*Folkbildning viktigt. Mer än bara dialog. Det är medskapande
+d.v.s. inflytande på riktigt.. Det handlar om
+Kunskapsutgämning. Fripost är mer än ett moln. Och teknike är inte
+svårare än att vi klarar av det tillsammans. Sju eller tusen
+medlemmar*
+
+*Extremfallen -- när centraliering gick för långt*
+  
+  * *Transportstyrelseskandalen -- vad har de med saken att göra?*
+
+  * *Google i skolan*
+
+*Det som sitter i ledningen för transportssyrelsen är uppenbarligen en
+för liten grupp för att de ska kunna ta ansvar.*
+
+*Exempel på almänningar*
+
+  * *Böndernas kamp för jord*
+  
+  * *Kampen för rätten till vatten*
+  
+*Som sagt Internet är en gemensam infrastruktur.*
+  
+*Skalan -- finns det en optimal storlek?*
+
+# Avslutning
+
+Se till att få en positiv klang. Detta är riktningen.
+
+# Noter
+
+Målet är tredelat 
+
+ 1. Att lyfta fram Fripost som förening och våra intressefrågor
+ 
+ 2. Kritisera dikotomin offentligt--privat och föreslå "det gemensamma"
+ 
+ 3. Uppmuntra till handling
+
+	* Genomskåda och säg nej till elitismen där den finns
+	* Organisera demokratiskt
+
+    
-- 
cgit v1.2.3


From eed9a77e80f4cee79c50da62f93914d64768048f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gustav Eek <gustav.eek@etraveli.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 16:28:55 +0200
Subject: [prsnts/common-goods] Update to PDF and Makefile

---
 presentations/common-goods/Makefile      | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn |  6 ++---
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/Makefile b/presentations/common-goods/Makefile
index a9a2ed9..71d92d0 100644
--- a/presentations/common-goods/Makefile
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/Makefile
@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
 notes = \
   eek-2017-09-common-goods-notes-sv.pdf
 
-all: $(notes)
+other = \
+  proposal.pdf \
+  script.pdf
 
-%-notes-sv.pdf: script-sv.mdwn
-	pandoc -s -S -f markdown -t latex \
-          -V "classoption=a4paper,12pt" \
-          -V "geometry=paperwidth=.5\paperwidth,hmargin=8mm,top=10mm,bottom=15mm,includefoot" \
-          -o $(basename $<)_.pdf $<
+all: $(notes) $(other)
+
+
+%-notes-sv.pdf: script-sv_.pdf
 	echo '$(tex-includepdf-nup)' | pdflatex -jobname $(basename $@)
-	rm $(basename $<)_.pdf
 
 define tex-includepdf-nup
 \documentclass[a4paper, 11pt]{article}\
@@ -17,10 +17,34 @@ define tex-includepdf-nup
 \usepackage{pdfpages}\
 \pagestyle{empty}\
 \begin{document}\
-\includepdf[pages = -, nup = 2x1]{$(basename $<)_.pdf}\
+\includepdf[pages = -, nup = 2x1]{$(basename $<).pdf}\
 \end{document}
 endef
 
+script-sv_.pdf: script-sv_.tex
+	jobname=$(basename $@) ;\
+	echo "Rerun right" >> $(basename $@).log ;\
+	for i in {0..4}; do \
+          if grep -q 'Rerun.*right' $(basename $@).log; then \
+	    pdflatex -jobname $(basename $@) $<;\
+          fi ;\
+        done
+
+script-sv_.tex: script-sv.mdwn latex.sed
+	pandoc -s -S -f markdown -t latex \
+          -V "classoption=a4paper,12pt" \
+          -V "geometry=paperwidth=.5\paperwidth,hmargin=10mm,top=15mm,bottom=15mm,includefoot" \
+          < $< \
+          | sed -f latex.sed > $@
+
+
+
+$(other): %.pdf: %.mdwn
+	pandoc -s -S -f markdown -t latex \
+          -V "classoption=a4paper,12pt" \
+          -V "geometry=hmargin=20mm,top=20mm,bottom=15mm,includefoot" \
+          -o $(basename $<).pdf $<
+
 clean:
 	rm -f $(notes)
 	rm -f *.aux *.log
diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn b/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn
index b58ba6d..b0519a5 100644
--- a/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
-title: (*en* Communication infrastructure – a form of resistance? *en*)(*sv* Kommunikationsinfrastruktur – en motståndsform? *sv*)
-subtitle: (*en* Fripost: digital technology as a common good for user freedom and control *en*)(*sv* Fripost: digital teknik som gemensam nyttighet för användarfrihet och -kontroll *sv*)
-author: Gustav Eek <gustav@fripost.org>
+title: '(*en* Communication infrastructure – a form of resistance? *en*)(*sv* Kommunikationsinfrastruktur – en motståndsform? *sv*)'
+subtitle: '(*en* Fripost: digital technology as a common good for user freedom and control *en*)(*sv* Fripost: digital teknik som gemensam nyttighet för användarfrihet och -kontroll *sv*)'
+author: 'Gustav Eek <gustav@fripost.org>'
 date: tor 13 jul 2017 20:18:26 CEST
 ...
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3


From e0f452d7aa5bf3f1b1074c657ada9514b8894f3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gustav Eek <gustav.eek@etraveli.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 16:29:26 +0200
Subject: [prsnts/common-goods] Significant updates to swedish script

---
 presentations/common-goods/script-sv.mdwn | 229 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 183 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/script-sv.mdwn b/presentations/common-goods/script-sv.mdwn
index c9cbf62..8a49642 100644
--- a/presentations/common-goods/script-sv.mdwn
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/script-sv.mdwn
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ---
-title: 'Kommunikationsinfrastruktur -- en motståndsform?'
+titel: 'Kommunikationsinfrastruktur -- en motståndsform?'
 subtitle: 'Fripost: digital teknik som gemensam nyttighet för användarfrihet och -kontroll'
 author: 'Gustav Eek <gustav@fripost.org>'
 date: 30 sep 2017
@@ -8,88 +8,225 @@ date: 30 sep 2017
 
 # Inledning
 
-*Vem är jag?*
+Jag är Gustav Eek. Här för Fripost. Sekreterare.
 
-*Vad är Fripost?*
+Fripost är en förening, bildad 2010, tillhandahåller elektroniska
+kommunikationslösningar, e-post, till medlemmarna under demokratiska
+omständigheter
 
+Här för att ställa frågor om organisation, kontroll och skala -- Finns
+det en perfekt storlek på organisationer?
 
-# Bakgrund
+(*Läs titel och undertitel*)
 
-*Vad gör jag här -- här på Bokmassan?*
+# Bakgrund -- Gemensam nytta
 
-*Problembilden, hotbilden*
+Så, vad gör jag här -- här på Bokmassan?
 
-*Demokrati, varför är det viktigt? Förtroendet för politiken, och
-kampen mot elitismen.*
+Böker, bibliotek, och tidningar och journalistik är kommunikation. Det
+är digitala s.k. "sociala media" också och e-post. Och Fripost:
 
-*Med bakgrund i Ugo Mattei*
+\begin{centering}
 
-*Det gemensamma, gemensam nytta och allmänning --
-definition. T.ex, allmänningen -- bruk i.s.f. ägande.*
+Fripost är \\ Fri och demokratiskt \\ kontrollerad e-post.
 
-*Det blir mer när man hjälps åt. ekologi i.s.f. ekonomi, hållbarhet
-i.s.f. begränsning*
+\end{centering}
 
+Gäller mer än så (problembilden, hotbilden):
 
-# Budskap -- Fripost är demokratisk
+Folk, särskilt unga, har ett större engagemang för politik. Men mindre
+tilltro till traditionell politik. Vi ser etablisemangskritiken,
+minskat förtroende för journalistik, "journalistikens kris", falska
+nyheter, etc. "Elitdemokrati" (Tillsammansskapet, Bokmassan 2017)
 
-*Det gemensamma kräver demokratisk organisering: Fuck
-etablisemanget och staten*
+Demokrati, varför är det viktigt? Varför måste vi kämpa mot elitismen?
 
-*Fripost är demokratisk*
+Med bakgrund i Ugo Mattei, *Gemensam Nytta*.
 
-*Kommunikaitonsinfrastrukturen är en allmänning precis som andra*
+Tycker *offenligt--privat* är fattig förståelse av resurser och
+organiserande, bygger på ägande. Vill återinföra en tredje form:
+*gemensamt* -- som måste hanteras av ett "gemensamt intellekt".
 
-# Belägg
+(*Om tid ges "kollektivt intellekt" (Digiden lab, Bokmassan 2017)*)
 
-*Hur vi organiserar -- de tre benen*
+Det handlar om det gemensamma, gemensam nytta och
+allmänningarna. Definition (inte men). Resurser, karraktäriseras av
+t.ex:
 
- * *Tekniken -- Vad vi faktiskt gör möjligt och att det är något*
+ * Bruk i.s.f. ägande: Maximalt nyttjande, "vad kan vi få ut av
+   detta?", inte "vad skulle jag kunna få istället?"
+ * Ekologi i.s.f. ekonomi
+ * Hållbarhet: en positiv (riktig) begränsning -- omsorg gentemot "den
+   andra" och nästa generation.
+ * "Det blir mer när man hjälps åt" (Lola om
+   t.ex. Tillsammansodlingen)
 
- * *Folkbildningen -- verkstäder o.s.v.*
+(*Om tid ges, jämför med Engels* ägande--varande (Mattei))
 
- * *Informationsspridning -- det är det som jag gör här*
+Västkust-amerikanska ekologen Garret Hardin presenterade 1968
+*Allmänningarnas tragedi* ... för att förklara ....
 
-*Folkbildning viktigt. Mer än bara dialog. Det är medskapande
-d.v.s. inflytande på riktigt.. Det handlar om
-Kunskapsutgämning. Fripost är mer än ett moln. Och teknike är inte
-svårare än att vi klarar av det tillsammans. Sju eller tusen
-medlemmar*
+*Citera Shiva. s. 44 p. 1*
 
-*Extremfallen -- när centraliering gick för långt*
-  
-  * *Transportstyrelseskandalen -- vad har de med saken att göra?*
+Flera har följt efter, både använt och kritiserat teorin. Inte
+möjlighet att gå in på detaljderna. Men det är tydligt att en
+ekonomisktik grundsyn är en förutsättning för Hardins
+slutsatser. Också tydligt att falsk, otillräcklig. Den som prompt vill
+analysera måste presentera en mer dynamisk analys.
 
-  * *Google i skolan*
+Ekonomer och andra har skrivit avhandlingar om äganderätten och privat
+ägande senan 1600-talet. Heller inte möjlighet att gå in på
+äganderättens historia.
 
-*Det som sitter i ledningen för transportssyrelsen är uppenbarligen en
-för liten grupp för att de ska kunna ta ansvar.*
+Logiken är att resurser som inte är naturligt begränsade, de behöver
+inte planeras och kontrolleras (eng. *managed*), och det som inte är
+kontrollerat kan inte skapa vinst. Artificiellt skapade begränsningar.
 
-*Exempel på almänningar*
+Allmänningarna, "mjuka i kanten" svåra att avgränsa (bestämma). Vi tar
+dem för givna. Blir tydliga under hotet att tas bort. (Shiva)
+
+*Kolla formulering*
+
+Utsätts ständigt för det hotet om privatisering. Återkommande attacker
+mot det gemensamma, då måste vi stå emot och försvara oss.
+
+Ex.
+
+  * Vår jord, som geografi och jordmån: de jordlösa böndernas kamp för
+	rätten att bruka den, *landsbyggdens kamp*.
+
+  * Vattnet är en gemensam resurs och rättighet. Kampen för rätten
+	till vatten: *urbana kamper*, mot Tatchers privatiseringsvåg i
+	England, i Bolivia för rätten att samla regn 2001
+
+  * Rätten att yttra sig och den fria journalistiken.
+
+Process av inhägnad: artificiell begränsning (Mattei).
+
+Ja, stå emot och försvara, vårt ansvar!
+
+
+# Budskapet -- Fripost och demokrati
+
+ 1. Kommunikaitonsinfrastrukturen är en allmänning precis som andra
+
+ 2. Det gemensamma kräver demokratisk organisering.
+
+ 3. Fripost är demokratisk
+
+Detta är viktigt: Också elektronisk infrastruktur kan (och måste)
+underställas demokratisk kontroll.
+
+
+# Digital kommunikation och demokratiska resurser
+
+Vad innebär en demokratisk resurs? Hur ska den organiseras?
+
+Hur Fripost organiserar -- tre grundpelare:
+
+ 1. *Tekniken* -- vad vi faktiskt gör möjligt och att det är något:
+	servrar och konfiguration
+
+ 2. *Folkbildningen* -- verkstäder o.s.v.*
+
+ 3. *Informationsspridning* -- det är det som jag gör här*
+
+*Hållbarhet* är ledordet.
+
+Alla tre lika viktiga: förutsättningar. Krav på tekniken. Respekterar
+användarfriheten: bara *fri programvara*, egen kontroll på servrar,
+o.s.v.
+
+Folkbildning viktigt. Det är medskapande d.v.s. *inflytande på
+riktigt*. Viktigt att kombinera digitala verktyg och fysiska möten
+(Digiden lab, Bokmassan 2017)
+
+Det är bara så jag kan förstå "Demokrati": *Likainflytande*.
+
+Som sagt. Enkäter visar, folk, särskilt unga, har ett större intresse
+för politik än på länge. Ändå minskar känslan att kunna påverka,
+förtroendet för traditionella parlamentariska politiska processer, och
+deltagande i partier.
+
+Etablisemangets svara är *medborgardialog*. Föreslaget av SKL,
+t.ex. infrastrukturprojekt. Rätfärdiga utan egentlig rättvisa.
+
+Riktigt deltagande kräver *delegerad makt* på *riktigt*.
+
+Likainflytande är ett ambitiöst anspråk. Mer än bara dialog. Det
+handlar om kunskapsutjämning och gemensamt beslutsfattande. Fripost är
+mer än ett fluffigt moln (tekniskt täcker föreningen förvisso in vad
+som presenteras som "moln" av kommersiella giganter). Och tekniken är
+inte svårare än att vi klarar av det tillsammans. Sju eller tusen
+medlemmar.
+
+Extremfallen -- när centraliering och utförsäljning gick för långt:
+
+  * Transportstyrelseskandalen -- vad har de med saken att göra?*
+
+  * Google i skolan
+
+Det som sitter i ledningen för transportssyrelsen är uppenbarligen en
+för liten grupp för att de ska kunna ta ansvar.
 
-  * *Böndernas kamp för jord*
-  
-  * *Kampen för rätten till vatten*
-  
-*Som sagt Internet är en gemensam infrastruktur.*
-  
 *Skalan -- finns det en optimal storlek?*
 
+*Som sagt Internet är en gemensam infrastruktur.*
+
 # Avslutning
 
-Se till att få en positiv klang. Detta är riktningen.
+Vi bildade föreningen 2010. Innan x, innan y, innan
+Snowden-avslöjanderna i tid då FRA-debattan var den heta. Vi reagerade
+mot centraliseringen av Internet och tjänster presenterade av Google
+m.fl. (*programmvara som tjänst*).
+
+*Se till att få en positiv klang. Detta är riktningen.*
+
+Jag medger allra ödmjukast att det som vi gör är i litet till skala
+och ambition. Men jag vill ända sätta det i en kontext av dessa
+viktiga lokala kamperna med globala implikationer. I världen kämpar
+bönderna för landet, stadsborna för vattnet, och studenter för
+oberoende universitet. Vi kämpar för fri och oberoende åtkomst till
+Internet och digitala kommunikaitonsmedel (och självklart vill vi ha
+sällskap i den kampen).
+
+Internet är designat för att vara distribuerat och för obegränsad
+åtkomst för alla. Det låter för mig som en typisk allmänning. Och
+allmänningar förutsätter likainflytande.
+
+(*Citera matei s. 64*)
+
 
 # Noter
 
-Målet är tredelat 
+Målet är tredelat
 
  1. Att lyfta fram Fripost som förening och våra intressefrågor
- 
+
  2. Kritisera dikotomin offentligt--privat och föreslå "det gemensamma"
- 
+
  3. Uppmuntra till handling
 
 	* Genomskåda och säg nej till elitismen där den finns
 	* Organisera demokratiskt
 
-    
+Försök kritisera dikotomin *offentlig--privat* utan att använda
+komplicerade uttryck: "dikotomin".
+
+Som sagt. Enkäter visar, folk, särskilt unga, har ett större intresse
+för politik än på länge. Ändå minskar känslan att kunna påverka,
+förtroendet för traditionella parlamentariska politiska processer, och
+deltagande i partier.
+
+Etablisemangets svara är *medborgardialog*. Föreslaget av
+SKL, t.ex. infrastrukturprojekt. Inspirerat av
+
+> As a response, the municipalities and regions in Sweden (SKL (*Vad?*))
+> suggest so called citizen dialogues (*medborgardialoger*), usually in
+> connection with major infrastructure and city development projects, as
+> a way gather peoples opinion. This (*tilltag*) is Inspired by Sherry
+> Airnstein (*Kolla upp detta*) and planning research from the
+> 1960'es. Her original ideas, however, had an equality idea
+> (*rättvisetanke?*. That idea of equality is totally lost in the way
+> these "dialoges" are committed: "Symbolic participation", Airnstein
+> would call it. Real participation require delegated power. (Thörn 2017)
-- 
cgit v1.2.3


From 2a0e99bfd6b73e33843780aaa54ad4a8db4c44dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gustav Eek <gustav.eek@etraveli.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 17:09:14 +0200
Subject: [prsnts/common-goods] Proposal separated by language

The common proposal *proposal.mdwn* containing two languages is
separated into *proposal-sv.mdwn* and *proposal-en.mdwn*. *Makefile*
for PDF production etc. is ofcourse updated. Also the *README*.
---
 presentations/common-goods/Makefile         |   8 +-
 presentations/common-goods/README           |   8 +-
 presentations/common-goods/latex.sed        |   7 ++
 presentations/common-goods/proposal-en.mdwn |  84 +++++++++++++++++++
 presentations/common-goods/proposal-sv.mdwn |  31 +++++++
 presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn    | 120 ----------------------------
 6 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 126 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 presentations/common-goods/latex.sed
 create mode 100644 presentations/common-goods/proposal-en.mdwn
 create mode 100644 presentations/common-goods/proposal-sv.mdwn
 delete mode 100644 presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn

diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/Makefile b/presentations/common-goods/Makefile
index 71d92d0..68df7fe 100644
--- a/presentations/common-goods/Makefile
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/Makefile
@@ -2,7 +2,8 @@ notes = \
   eek-2017-09-common-goods-notes-sv.pdf
 
 other = \
-  proposal.pdf \
+  proposal-en.pdf \
+  proposal-sv.pdf \
   script.pdf
 
 all: $(notes) $(other)
@@ -42,7 +43,7 @@ script-sv_.tex: script-sv.mdwn latex.sed
 $(other): %.pdf: %.mdwn
 	pandoc -s -S -f markdown -t latex \
           -V "classoption=a4paper,12pt" \
-          -V "geometry=hmargin=20mm,top=20mm,bottom=15mm,includefoot" \
+          -V "geometry=hmargin=35mm,top=20mm,bottom=15mm,includefoot" \
           -o $(basename $<).pdf $<
 
 clean:
@@ -50,8 +51,7 @@ clean:
 	rm -f *.aux *.log
 	rm -f *.tex
 	rm -f *.pdf
-	rm -f *~
-
+	rm -f *~ *_.* *_
 
 
 SHELL = /bin/bash
diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/README b/presentations/common-goods/README
index 3c90f74..399b3bc 100644
--- a/presentations/common-goods/README
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/README
@@ -5,8 +5,12 @@ nytta. Inspirationen kommer från Mattei's *Gemensam Nytta*.
 
 **Dokument**
 
- * *application.mdwn* -- Ansökan till FSCONS 2017
- * *script.mdwn* -- Manuskriptet
+ * *proposal-sv.mdwn* -- Ansökan till Bokmassan 2017
+ * *proposal-en.mdwn* -- Ansökan till FSCONS 2017
+ * *script-sv.mdwn* -- Manuskriptet Bokmassan 2017
+ * *script.mdwn* -- Manuskriptet (master)
  * *presentation.mdwn* -- Presentationsorginal
  * *bibliography.mdwn* -- Vad det låter som
  * *Makefile* -- Kör *make* för att bygga 
+ 
+ 
diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/latex.sed b/presentations/common-goods/latex.sed
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5d1e532
--- /dev/null
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/latex.sed
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+/\\title/ {
+    s/Kommunikationsinfrastruktur/Kommunikations\\-infra\\-struk\\-tur/g
+}
+
+/begin.*document/,/end.*document/ {
+#    s/demokratisk/demo\\-kra\\-tisk/g
+}
diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/proposal-en.mdwn b/presentations/common-goods/proposal-en.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d3bb63c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/proposal-en.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+---
+title: 'Communication infrastructure – a form of resistance?'
+subtitle: 'Fripost: digital technology as a common good for user freedom and control'
+author: 'Gustav Eek <gustav@fripost.org>'
+date: tor 13 jul 2017 20:18:26 CEST
+...
+
+
+Proposal to FSCONS 2017
+
+# Abstract
+
+In this lecture the democratic principles of Fripost, the free email
+association (founded in 2010) will be presented. Infrastructure for
+electronic communication will be resembled with a common good (a
+resource). That using a critique of the *public--private* dichotomy,
+and the tragedy of the commons. I will then demonstrate how also
+complicated resources can (and must) be made subject to democratic
+control.
+
+# Description
+
+The importance of Internet as communication medium can not be
+questioned. For those who take user freedom seriously it is saddening
+to see how the Internet has changed from being a common and highly
+distributed network to the increasingly privatised web we encounter
+today.
+
+In this lecture I will present the democratic principles of Fripost,
+the free email association which was founded as a reaction to that
+development. I will resemble infrastructure for electronic
+communication with a common good (a resource), and I will demonstrate
+how also complicated resources can (and must) be made subject to
+democratic control.
+
+Fripost and its foundation and democratic principals has been
+presented several times since its constitution in 2010, also at
+FSCONS. This is why the lecture also will take a different and broader
+stand, inspired by some recent readings. The Fripost initiative will
+also be put in context of local struggles with global implication.
+
+In short, the idea that every resource needs an single responsible and
+managing owner is unsatisfactory as well as the dichotomy
+*public--private*. What is not managed can not yield profit. But some
+things are to important even to be managed. Naturally this touches on
+a critique (which has been presented many times before) of Hardin's
+classical tragedy of the commons. Regarding the enclosure of the
+commons, management in it self causes the scarcity, The commons are
+not scarce resources that requires management.
+
+It is not obvious, however, how digital technology and technology
+based on Internet can be recognised as a resource and common
+good. Though "friendly" in its usage, digital technology is
+intrinsically intricate and complicated in its internals, and the
+distance is far between the providing and consuming ends. What is the
+interpretation of democratic influence and control in the case of
+digital technology? And what is user freedom for Internet services?
+
+Here Fripost becomes an example of central communication
+infrastructure that implements democratic "ownership", maintenance,
+and development. And democracy is *equal influence*: it does not stop
+at the gathering of opinion.
+
+Equal influence is ambitious, and how it is interpreted in Fripost
+will be discussed in its details, but in short the key is that
+Fripost's commitment is equally much social as it is technical: all
+decisions originates from the members, short term as well as
+strategical; activities are balanced between the association's three
+legs: (a) technology, (b) adult education, and (c) propaganda; and
+sustainability is the leading word.
+
+I humbly recognise that what we do is small in scale and ambition. But
+I still want to put it in the context of important local struggles
+that with global implication. In the world, farmers fight for land,
+urban folks for water, and students for independent universities. We
+fight for the right and free access to Internet and the means for
+communication. Internet is designed to be distributed and for equal
+unlimited access for everyone. That sounds quite much like a common
+good, and commons require equal influence.
+
+The moral of the presentation is of course that we should fight back
+against the privatisation process, particularly that of the
+web. Fripost illustrates that it is possible and also suggest how it
+can be done.
diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/proposal-sv.mdwn b/presentations/common-goods/proposal-sv.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f96f622
--- /dev/null
+++ b/presentations/common-goods/proposal-sv.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+---
+title: 'Kommunikationsinfrastruktur – en motståndsform?'
+subtitle: Fripost: digital teknik som gemensam nyttighet för användarfrihet och -kontroll'
+author: 'Gustav Eek <gustav@fripost.org>'
+date: tor 13 jul 2017 20:18:26 CEST
+...
+
+
+Förslag Bokmassan 2017
+
+# Sammanfattning
+
+I seminariet kommer vi presentera de demokratiska principerna som
+ligger till grund för föreningen Fripost, den demokratiska
+e-postföreningen (som grundades 2010). Vi kommer dra relevanta
+paralleller mellan elektronisk kommunikationsinfrastruktur och
+gemensamma nyttigheter (de är t.ex. båda resurser). Det bland annat
+genom att kritisera dikotomin *offentlig--privat* och vanliga idéer
+kring Allmänningarnas tragedi. Vi kommer också i detalj beskriva hur
+en komplex och komplicerad resurs kan (och måste) underställas
+demokratisk kontroll.
+
+# Description *en*)(*sv* Beskrivnign *sv*)
+
+Likainflytande är ett ambitiöst anspråk, och hur det tolkas i Fripost
+kommer diskuteras i dess detaljer. I korthet ligger det centrala i att
+Friposts åtagande lika mycket är socialt som tekniskt: alla beslut har
+sitt ursprung i medlemmarna, kortsiktiga så väl som
+strategiska. Därför baseras föreningens verksamhet på tre grundpelare:
+(a) teknik, (b) folkbildning och (c) informationsspridning; och
+hållbarhet är ledordet.
diff --git a/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn b/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn
deleted file mode 100644
index b0519a5..0000000
--- a/presentations/common-goods/proposal.mdwn
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,120 +0,0 @@
----
-title: '(*en* Communication infrastructure – a form of resistance? *en*)(*sv* Kommunikationsinfrastruktur – en motståndsform? *sv*)'
-subtitle: '(*en* Fripost: digital technology as a common good for user freedom and control *en*)(*sv* Fripost: digital teknik som gemensam nyttighet för användarfrihet och -kontroll *sv*)'
-author: 'Gustav Eek <gustav@fripost.org>'
-date: tor 13 jul 2017 20:18:26 CEST
-...
-
-
-(*en* Proposal to FSCONS 2017 *en*)(*sv* Förslag Bokmassan 2017 *sv*)
-
-# (*en* Abstract *en*)(*sv* Sammanfattning *sv*)
-
-(*en*
-
-In this lecture the democratic principles of Fripost, the free email
-association (founded in 2010) will be presented. Infrastructure for
-electronic communication will be resembled with a common good (a
-resource). That using a critique of the *public--private* dichotomy,
-and the tragedy of the commons. I will then demonstrate how also
-complicated resources can (and must) be made subject to democratic
-control.
-
-*en*)
-(*sv*
-
-I seminariet kommer vi presentera de demokratiska principerna som
-ligger till grund för föreningen Fripost, den demokratiska
-e-postföreningen (som grundades 2010). Vi kommer dra relevanta
-paralleller mellan elektronisk kommunikationsinfrastruktur och
-gemensamma nyttigheter (de är t.ex. båda resurser). Det bland annat
-genom att kritisera dikotomin *offentlig--privat* och vanliga idéer
-kring Allmänningarnas tragedi. Vi kommer också i detalj beskriva hur
-en komplex och komplicerad resurs kan (och måste) underställas
-demokratisk kontroll.
-
-*sv*)
-
-
-# (*en* Description *en*)(*sv* Beskrivnign *sv*)
-
-(*en*
-
-The importance of Internet as communication medium can not be
-questioned. For those who take user freedom seriously it is saddening
-to see how the Internet has changed from being a common and highly
-distributed network to the increasingly privatised web we encounter
-today.
-
-In this lecture I will present the democratic principles of Fripost,
-the free email association which was founded as a reaction to that
-development. I will resemble infrastructure for electronic
-communication with a common good (a resource), and I will demonstrate
-how also complicated resources can (and must) be made subject to
-democratic control.
-
-Fripost and its foundation and democratic principals has been
-presented several times since its constitution in 2010, also at
-FSCONS. This is why the lecture also will take a different and broader
-stand, inspired by some recent readings. The Fripost initiative will
-also be put in context of local struggles with global implication.
-
-In short, the idea that every resource needs an single responsible and
-managing owner is unsatisfactory as well as the dichotomy
-*public--private*. What is not managed can not yield profit. But some
-things are to important even to be managed. Naturally this touches on
-a critique (which has been presented many times before) of Hardin's
-classical tragedy of the commons. Regarding the enclosure of the
-commons, management in it self causes the scarcity, The commons are
-not scarce resources that requires management.
-
-It is not obvious, however, how digital technology and technology
-based on Internet can be recognised as a resource and common
-good. Though "friendly" in its usage, digital technology is
-intrinsically intricate and complicated in its internals, and the
-distance is far between the providing and consuming ends. What is the
-interpretation of democratic influence and control in the case of
-digital technology? And what is user freedom for Internet services?
-
-Here Fripost becomes an example of central communication
-infrastructure that implements democratic "ownership", maintenance,
-and development. And democracy is *equal influence*: it does not stop
-at the gathering of opinion.
-
-Equal influence is ambitious, and how it is interpreted in Fripost
-will be discussed in its details, but in short the key is that
-Fripost's commitment is equally much social as it is technical: all
-decisions originates from the members, short term as well as
-strategical; activities are balanced between the association's three
-legs: (a) technology, (b) adult education, and (c) propaganda; and
-sustainability is the leading word.
-
-*en*)
-(*sv*
-
-Likainflytande är ett ambitiöst anspråk, och hur det tolkas i Fripost
-kommer diskuteras i dess detaljer. I korthet ligger det centrala i att
-Friposts åtagande lika mycket är socialt som tekniskt: alla beslut har
-sitt ursprung i medlemmarna, kortsiktiga så väl som
-strategiska. Därför baseras föreningens verksamhet på tre grundpelare:
-(a) teknik, (b) folkbildning och (c) informationsspridning; och
-hållbarhet är ledordet.
-
-*sv*)
-(*en*
-
-I humbly recognise that what we do is small in scale and ambition. But
-I still want to put it in the context of important local struggles
-that with global implication. In the world, farmers fight for land,
-urban folks for water, and students for independent universities. We
-fight for the right and free access to Internet and the means for
-communication. Internet is designed to be distributed and for equal
-unlimited access for everyone. That sounds quite much like a common
-good, and commons require equal influence.
-
-The moral of the presentation is of course that we should fight back
-against the privatisation process, particularly that of the
-web. Fripost illustrates that it is possible and also suggest how it
-can be done.
-
-*en*)
-- 
cgit v1.2.3